Fitzroy Gardens

Though overcast, cold and wet underfoot, I started my workday with a walk through the Fitzroy Gardens. Des joined me, of course.

This photo of the fern frond was taken with the Sigma lens at 300mm with the camera braced on a rock wall and shutter speed of 1/30 sec. With more patience, a steadier surface so I could have increased the aperture, and a better angle it would have come out a lot better.

Just a grab shot while I was sitting on the ground.

For these two droplet photos, I used manual flash on 1/16th setting, and a shutter speed suitable for hand holding the lens (between 80-250). Depth of field was no more than 5.6 or 8. Somehow I need to be able to get more light in so that I can have greater depth of field. I'm not sure that the in-built flash is the answer.

Also, these are not 1:1 macro. They were around the 1:2 or 1:3 mark.

I love those big old trees. One day I'll figure out how to capture their magnificence without having the city street in frame.

I tried flash on these flowers and they burned out. Going back to natural lighting reduced my shutter speed and depth of field. These two shots aren't in perfect focus. Keeping the view small hides many flaws. :-)

I like the exposure on this one, though I'd have preferred to have the stem in focus as well. A better angle and more patience would have netted a better shot.

In summary, all photos were taken with a manual lens, either the 90mm macro (Elicar) or 70-300mm zoom (Sigma). I'm finding it easier to judge near correct exposure and am used to checking the histogram. Correct exposure is also, I'm learning, a matter of personal choice.

For instance, in the photo above the background is slightly washed out. Another image of the same location, same angle and composition, is darker. I prefer the lighter one because I feel is has greater depth, but really a better image would have been somewhere in between these two. These nuances are harder to judge in the field even with the benefit of the histogram and the image viewer, and I refuse to photoshop or 'fix' when I get back home.On what made the difference between these two images, I can't recall whether I changed shutter speed or aperture or both. The top image let in more light which means either the shutter speed was slower or the aperture smaller -- or both.

I've not yet tried exposure compensation, where incremental changes are made to change the exposure, nor have I explored much of what Des can do, for instance changing white balance, or flash compensation, or all those other little buttons on his back that I've not read up about. And he's a simple camera in comparison to some of the modern DSLRs. That is another reason I'm glad I got him and not the more expensive (and complicated) D90. I fear my brain might explode with a more complex camera.

This is so much fun though! I wonder where I can take Des tomorrow. :-)